Training with METs: A Practical Guide to Estimating Energy Use
We use METs to translate effort into a simple energy estimate that works across activities. While no single model captures every nuance, a consistent approach lets us plan sessions, compare options, and align fueling with our goals without overcomplicating the process.
What METs capture
METs summarize the energy cost of a task as a multiple of resting metabolism. Values come from population studies and lab protocols. Because they’re standardized, they’re perfect for planning—especially when we need a quick answer for “about how many calories will this session cost?”
Choosing intensities that fit
Intensity should reflect purpose. Easy days favor light to moderate METs for aerobic development and recovery; hard days push into vigorous territory for stimulus. We match the intensity to the session goal and our current fitness.
Weekly structure and adaptation
Weekly calories aggregate across sessions and can guide fueling. Large jumps in weekly burn without corresponding recovery often degrade performance. We ramp volume gradually, watch sleep and soreness, and rotate intensities to keep progress steady.
Fueling and the energy balance conversation
Energy balance is simple in theory and dynamic in real life. We pair weekly burn with intake targets, favoring protein for satiety and recovery, and adequate carbs around higher-MET sessions. Hydration and micronutrients support performance, especially in heat and long durations.
When to use Custom MET
If we have lab data, power meters, or trusted device outputs, Custom MET bridges those readings into a common framework. It’s an easy way to keep our planning tool aligned with richer measurements without rebuilding the whole model.
Limitations and good judgment
Terrain, technique, and conditions can shift real energy cost significantly. We treat our estimates as signal, not perfection—good enough to plan, compare, and improve while we collect better personal data over time.